Len wrote:
> Me thinks the real stall speed would be a bit higher in that at touch
> down your in ground effect. My guess that a coupe at full gross out
> of ground effect would probably need something around 60 to keep
> livitating. I an not exactly a little guy so I carry at least 80 down
> final


Len,

Solo, I was flying near 1320 lb.  With idle power, it probably would have
been about 55 mph at touchdown.  With 200 rpm, the slipstream pushes down
extra on the tail and I got about 50 mph at touchdown.

I tended to fly my final approach at about 1.3 times the idle minimum flying
speed.  Idle minimum flying speed of 55 * 1.3 = 71.5 mph.

The 50 mph "stall" I had on landing came after I started a flare at about
70, leveled out a yard above the pavement, went to about 200 rpm above idle
and held it off, held it off, held it off till I couldn't hold it off any
more.  THAT'S when I got the 50 mph airspeed with the 9° elevator up travel.

This was a way that presented no danger of high sink rate – I was level and
just a yard high.  As soon as I started to get sink, I touched down in a
beautifully light squeaker landing.

Having power from the engine, the slipstream lets the elevator push the tail
down extra far and thus lets the wings go to a higher angle of attack which,
in turn, allows for a lower airspeed.  It never develops a full stall but it
sure does sink!

On short fields, I did not add the 200 rpm, landed at 55 mph and got on the
brakes.  I could **always** easily land on fields in a shorter distance than
the length needed for takeoff.

Ed


Reply via email to