All,

Ummmm.  I am the one who started this round of snubber-cable discussions.

It was lit off by my observation that, having recently removed the snubber
cable, I am elated at the improved control I get in cross-winds and regular
landings, also.

 

Video analysis of my landings indicates that, using my nose-high landing
technique, and WITH a snubber-cable,I land on the mains with the nose wheel
far off the ground.

But, WITHOUT the snubber, I land just about precisely on three points every
time.

 

AND NOW A NEW ADDITION TO THE SNUBBER-CABLE THEORY (Not really a product of
my own insight, however.)

The Coupe was designed when most strips were grass surfaced.  So, dragging
the nose-wheel a bit sideways on landing was no big deal.

But, dragging a nose wheel sideways across today's asphalt can cause some
serious tire wear.  The snubber-cable may help to minimize this.

 

ERGO: I suppose that the snubber-cable may allow the Coupe to straighten out
more on the mains alone before the nose-wheel touches.  This would save a
bunch of wear in cross-wind landings.

But, I really like the way my bird handles, now, without it.  AND, I like
the way it handles cross-wind TAKEOFFS better, too.

 

Dave W

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of William R. Bayne
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 4:15 PM
To: Ercoupe Tech Forum
Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Re: snubber cable

 


In my opinion the purpose of this list is to help owners and potential 
owners and/or
operators of the Ercoupe (et al) understand what the design is (and is 
not) capable of,
and how to best achieve same. Everyone learns something here, sooner 
or later.

Not one of us was born knowing it all. Some pick it up from available 
information (when
all else fails, read the Instructions). Some need help locating 
"available information".

The "average" Ercoupe changes hands every five years (some "never" and 
some
much more often). It is, therefore, natural and desirable that around 
400 "new" owners,
more than one a day, may have a legitimate need to raise one or more 
questions that
have been discussed before. There are few questions posed here that 
are "new".

Just because a person has "advanced" to the point on a given subject 
that they believe
they have "heard it all" does not mean that someone else's query should 
not post or run
to its logical "conclusion", however parallel that may be to an earlier 
one on the same
subject.



Reply via email to