This was written to me off line so I don't want to post it on the forum with
the name attached:

 ___________________________________

 

WOW, I was not aware of the problems. But, I have been concerned about the
LSA rules, where the standards are agreed upon by ASTM members of the LSA
group. I have been a member of ASTM (no longer active), and have a pretty
good feeling about how one arrives at standards...often resulting in minimum
performance requirements.

 

A group member proposes a standard, members discuss each issue, and finally
agree on a standard. This discussion often involves many compromises to suit
a particular member, and the resulting standard holds no individual
responsible. "We met The standard"....... !

 

Perhaps we will see a renewed Certification standard, that should be equal
to other certified aircraft standards, and tests; not just certified to meet
ASTM LSA Standards.... 

 

Hopefully.

 ___________________________________

 

I can understand your position, however, I hope we do not see the LSA
standard upgraded to the cost and prohibitive state of standard
certification.

 

When the LSA standards were under development, I joined the ASTM and the LSA
fixed wing committee.  I participated in the standards development document
and conference call meetings during my one-year membership, and read and
commented on each document and change.

 

What I saw were standards being put in place that were very similar to the
regular certification standards.  The climb, takeoff, control pressures,
flight testing, etc. were, in my opinion, more than is needed.  Largely,
they were lifted from the Canadian light sport regulations and from the U.S.
certification regulations.

 

Due to the rigidity, a bunch of illegal (but tacitly allowed by the FAA)
ultralight and ultralight trainer manufacturers were unable to meet the ASTM
standards (mostly because of the parts/raw materials/inventory control
requirements).  Some still manufacture under the experimental kit category
making excellent ExpAB aircraft.

 

Chris Heintz was the key mover in making the standards higher than they
would have been otherwise.

 

Remember that flutter is something that's hard to predict.  Look at the
Ercoupe's history.  We've had few flutter accidents but we have had a few.
I almost was a flutter accident when I got aileron flutter.  It was probably
only my luck/preparedness that allowed me to diagnose the problem, see the
solution and implement the solution within 2-3 seconds that kept me from
fluttering to the ground with only one wing on my Coupe.

 

I expect that Zenith and Heintz will find a fix for this problem.

 

Ed

 

Reply via email to