All,

 

 

Most, and our, fuel systems are designed so that the fuel pump is capable of 
pumping more fuel than the engine can consume at maximum output.

 

 In a "normal" presurized fuel system the fuel is almost constantly flowing 
thru a variable "restriction", the needle and seat. The taper on the end of the 
needle allows the fuel to flow at a volume dependent on engine demand. As more 
fuel is demanded, the float falls thus allowing more volume (and of course at 
lower demands the PRESSURE will in fact be higher and vise-versa)

 

This is pure quess on my part but I suspect that if the fuel pump were allowed 
to run at high rpms (fast strokes) without back pressure you could get 
"flutter" in the valves or diaphram or pump cavitation.

 

Bill


To: [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:47:16 -0700
Subject: [ercoupe-tech] Fuel Pump Restrictor











On the restriction of the fuel pump outlet.  It seems to me that it would be 
more efficient to let the fuel pump free run without the restrictor and let 
part of the pressure bypass back to the inlet.  Wouldn’t that take some of the 
load off the pump?  Am I missing something here?

Chris 
99674 in restoration 

‘--o-O-o--’







_________________________________________________________________
Rediscover Hotmail®: Get quick friend updates right in your inbox. 
http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Updates2_042009

Reply via email to