Jim,

I've never flown a Cherokee 140 so perhaps some comparison with a Short Wing
Piper would give you some information.

A friend had the 2-place version of the Tri-Pacer, the Colt.

At very low airspeeds, the Colt could sink even better than the Ercoupe, but
it was in the same ballpark.  The sink rate at very low airspeeds is amazing
in those thick wing aircraft.

So, while flying mine for a couple of decades, I didn't fly at very low
airspeeds near the ground except when doing very, very careful tests.

When flown near of faster than the best glide speed, Coupes, Short Wing
Pipers and thick-wing-Cherokees are quite well behaved.

So, pay attention and do it right.  And, in a feeble attempt at humor, that
is different from any other airplane type how?

Yes, the Coupes are noisy.  I recommend always using hearing defending
headsets.  Take a good set of those and beg a ride in a candidate Coupe and
see if it's acceptable to you.  I found it to be in the tolerable range with
my pre-active-noise-reduction Telex HearDefenders.

The bubble windshield on the Alon will be a bit quieter than the bent
flat-Plexiglas windshield on my Ercoupe.  Also, the later planes had more
sound insulation (and thus also, a bit more weight) than my earlier plane.

A big advantage of the Ercoupe, Forney Aircoupes and some Alon Aircoupes is
that they have full vision canopies with no "roof."  Yeah, the sky overhead
isn't as interesting as the ground, but I love the full arc visibility of
the sky around me.  The later Alon Aircoupes and the Mooney have the top of
the canopy painted or something as if it were a solid roof.  You're back in
the cave like in so many other aircraft.  Pfuey!

Yes, the Cherokee will be roomier and quieter than any model Coupe.  Perhaps
that'll fit your mission better.  Coupes will burn about 5.4-5.6 gph or,
with an O-200 about 6 gph or so.

To me, most importantly, my observation is that Coupes are more fun to fly.

Ed Burkhead

http://edburkhead.com/Ercoupe/index.htm 

ed -at- edbur???khead.yyy       change -at- to @, remove the ??? and change
yyy to com

 

Reply via email to