Hey Ed,
Although I plan for 5 GPH, normal X-C fuel burn for my O-200 powered Coupe is 
around 4.8 GPH.   

I've burned as little as 4 GPH on a flight from O69 to CNO (18 gallons for 4.5 
hours non-stop, at altitude, leaned out & throttled back).  

My O-200 powered Coupe rarely burns 6 GPH unless I'm flying at low altitude at 
full power, which I rarely do, since the speed gain is hardly worth the 
increased fuel burn.

Anyway, I enjoy going low and slow throttled back unless I'm going somewhere, 
in which case I'd be up at cruise altitudes of 5,00 to 9,500'.     

If I really want to go faster, I'd buy an RV (which I may do, but if so, giving 
up 68H is really going to HURT).

Dan Hall
N3968H

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ed Burkhead 
  To: [email protected] ; ety 
  Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 4:40 PM
  Subject: RE: [ercoupe-tech] Differences between an Alon Aircoupe vs. Piper 
Cherokee 140





   

  Jim,

  I've never flown a Cherokee 140 so perhaps some comparison with a Short Wing 
Piper would give you some information.

  A friend had the 2-place version of the Tri-Pacer, the Colt.

  At very low airspeeds, the Colt could sink even better than the Ercoupe, but 
it was in the same ballpark.  The sink rate at very low airspeeds is amazing in 
those thick wing aircraft.

  So, while flying mine for a couple of decades, I didn't fly at very low 
airspeeds near the ground except when doing very, very careful tests.

  When flown near of faster than the best glide speed, Coupes, Short Wing 
Pipers and thick-wing-Cherokees are quite well behaved.

  So, pay attention and do it right.  And, in a feeble attempt at humor, that 
is different from any other airplane type how?

  Yes, the Coupes are noisy.  I recommend always using hearing defending 
headsets.  Take a good set of those and beg a ride in a candidate Coupe and see 
if it's acceptable to you.  I found it to be in the tolerable range with my 
pre-active-noise-reduction Telex HearDefenders.

  The bubble windshield on the Alon will be a bit quieter than the bent 
flat-Plexiglas windshield on my Ercoupe.  Also, the later planes had more sound 
insulation (and thus also, a bit more weight) than my earlier plane.

  A big advantage of the Ercoupe, Forney Aircoupes and some Alon Aircoupes is 
that they have full vision canopies with no "roof."  Yeah, the sky overhead 
isn't as interesting as the ground, but I love the full arc visibility of the 
sky around me.  The later Alon Aircoupes and the Mooney have the top of the 
canopy painted or something as if it were a solid roof.  You're back in the 
cave like in so many other aircraft.  Pfuey!

  Yes, the Cherokee will be roomier and quieter than any model Coupe.  Perhaps 
that'll fit your mission better.  Coupes will burn about 5.4-5.6 gph or, with 
an O-200 about 6 gph or so.

  To me, most importantly, my observation is that Coupes are more fun to fly.

  Ed Burkhead

  http://edburkhead.com/Ercoupe/index.htm 

  ed -at- edbur???khead.yyy       change -at- to @, remove the ??? and change 
yyy to com

   




  


------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.39/2134 - Release Date: 05/25/09 
18:14:00

Reply via email to