Yes, but do you love the skull cap???? Kevin1
--- In [email protected], "carl_lavon" <profedi...@...> wrote: > > PIZZA ON THIS TOPIC!! DAMN! THIS IS LIKE SOME PhD TO MD ARGUMENTS I HAVE > BEEN A PART OF! FRICKIN' ENOUGH ALREADY! > > BTW, did I mention that even though I had to sell my Ercoupe I still love > this Forum?! > > Carl LaVon > > > > > --- In [email protected], Bill BIGGS <webacraft@> wrote: > > > > > > To get technical, AC120-77 does not pertain to Ercoupes unless they are for > > hire, and it specifically states it is advisory in nature and not a > > regulation. > > > > > > > > http://rgl.faa.gov/REGULATORY_AND_GUIDANCE_LIBRARY/RGADVISORYCIRCULAR.NSF/0/199e798c7ee4347786256c4d004ae5dc/$FILE/AC%20120-77.pdf > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > From: ercoguru@ > > Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 12:38:15 -0500 > > Subject: Fwd: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Skull cap spinner > > > > > > > > > > Sorry all, > > > > To get attachments, go to: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ercoupe-tech/files/ > > > > Look up: > > > > AC120-77.pdf > > > > FAA-Definition of Type Certificate > > > > Regards, > > > > WRB > > > > -- > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > > > > From: William R. Bayne <ercoguru@> > > Date: September 3, 2009 11:20:21 CDT > > To: Ercoupe Tech List <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Re: Skull cap spinner [2 Attachments] > > > > > > Kevin, > > > > Please. > > > > Read the following attachments. > > > > William R. Bayne > > .____|-(o)-|____. > > (Copyright 2009) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > On Sep 3, 2009, at 08:17, kgassert wrote: > > > > > > "And my "point" has been that applicable federal regulations determine > > the totality that comprise "the current TCDS". There is more to it > > than just what can be downloaded from the FAA whether you are aware of > > the remainder or have access to it or not. How likely would a police > > officer yield to a driver's argument that the law he violated was not > > taught him, he did not know of it, and he did not know how to ask for a > > copy? "Ignorance is no excuse" will say the judge." > > > > No, this is where you are wrong. Where did you get the idea that a bunch of > > drawings were part of the TC? What is downloaded from the FAA site is the > > TC and that is what an A&P and IA has to go to and make sure the aircraft > > conforms to. If something is in some drawing and the manufacturer wants it > > to be required he puts it in the TC. If he doesn't then too bad, maybe he > > should have but he didn't so if he wants it he better amend the the TC. And > > believe me he will and it is done all the time. > > > > Kevin1 > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you're up to on > > Facebook. > > http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009 > > >
