* I would suggest that any regulatory "question" more
* concerns owner initiated good-faith attempts to convert * a 415-C to a 415-D or 415-E in accordance with * Ercoupe Information Letter No. 1 dated Jan. 1., 1956. Not being a lawyer, I don't know how often "good-faith attempts" overrules the actual law to the defendant's detriment. I can see a jury judging that a good faith attempt to comply with a law could merit a failure to convict. I find it hard to see that a jury would find that some other person's good faith attempt to do something, yet failing and being illegal, overruled the words of a law to the detriment of another person And, FAR regulation breaking is not normally handled by a jury trial, is it? Can it be forced to a jury trial? And, isn't a poorly worded, ambiguous law or regulation invalid? I think we've exhausted the issue pretty well, again. Does anyone have anything new and different to add? Ed
