That's the point: my LED nav lights are safer than the originals. My X-com is safer than any radios in it in 1946 (did they have radios/?), etc. Dan C
On Jan 14, 2010, at 8:19 PM, [email protected] wrote: > In an aircraft (Antique Restoration) > You would use everything exactly as the original. Sometime it takes year of > research to een locate the originak part. With no expense sparred, everything > including fabrics of the period that were not fire retardant. The word for > restoration means money. You know, like the Boeing that went into the drink. > If you consider when the coupe was built with auto parts and fabrics that > were used in autos. Now just think about it please??? Can you legally > reupholster you coupe in the same TYPE fabric just because it was done then? > Hey let's be practical, We are not talking about a true restoration here > where this is permitted as museum restoration. What we're really talking > about is being safe and legal. So let's cut to the chase. We can't keep > saying > "That's how it was then with no TSO's or 337's or regs on it then, so now we > can do this-that or whatever." You're looking for trouble because, and you > would have to agree that there are those that will step too far over the > line. All I can say is. > Fly Right and stay safe > Prof. Ed > >
