Kim,

What you want to know is (1) how much the insurance company wants from you for the "remains" of your "totalled" plane, (2) a fixed price from a qualified mechanic to make it "whole" again, excluding engine repairs and (3) a quote for necessary labor and any minor parts to remove, disassemble, check, reassemble and reinstall the engine.

I disagree with the usual presumption that in a case like this the owner should be left "holding the bag".

I believe you previously paid for an engine overhaul and its removal and reinstallation. It is logical that the reason for the power loss would be on the shoulders of one of those service providers, and they should be "on the hook" for much of the necessary work INCLUDING any crankshaft replacement or repair. My approach would be to bring legal action (jury trial) on both since it would appear neither you nor your pilot "caused" the accident. That would leave each to defend or compromise their liability inasmuch as you clearly paid for a quality of work obviously and materially deficient that should not be your burden to sort out.

Unfortunately, you may have few rights if you chose a "big name" out-of-state firm to do your overhaul, since the "fine print" in such agreements works to the advantage of that firm to your considerable detriment. That is the primary reason why I would always opt for a field overhaul to be accomplished in my own state where the same person does all the work and has all the responsibility to stand behind same.

Just my "take",

WRB

--

On Jan 20, 2010, at 16:02, kim Blackseth wrote:




Group...

I was hoping for some of your collective advice. Below is my insurance company's response to my recently damaged 'coupe. Above that is my response...  I'd like some input from the group...

Kim Blackseth





This is the whole point of my wanting to see the plane. While it may be a total loss to you ($20K), it may take $30K (or something) to fix it.  If I know "about" what this number is, I can make the determination to "take a policyholder’s release (policy limit – salvage value = payable amount)" and add $10K of my money and fix it.

If it's unfixable (or some $50K to fix), it makes no sense for to to consider "the policyholders release". I'll take your settlement and buy a different plane.  However, I can't make that decision without having some kind of idea about condition or potential repair costs.

I'd like some kind of realistic repair cost, even if those costs exceed $20K. it will allow me to determine if  keep the hull, add some money to your settlement and repair it

Kim Blackseth, ICC, CASp
310 17th St
Oakland, CA
510-839-1760


On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Wolfe, Natsuno wrote:


Mr. Blacksmith:
I have made a phone call regarding the damage estimate – so far, even without looking at the actual airplane, the prop strike itself makes it a total loss based on the policy limit since a prop strike means an engine teardown. Then once the teardown is done, there may be a problem with the crankshaft, which means additional repairs.
 
As Dennis advised you, it will take some time before I can send someone to inspect the aircraft, but given the obvious, I don’t see what the physical inspection will accomplish (except more damage?). If this was a borderline total loss, then there is a good chance we may be able to repair the aircraft.
 
Another option is to take a policyholder’s release – I can perhaps offer to pay a sum (policy limit – salvage value = payable amount), but you will have to sign the release. This means you will be responsible for the repairs but you get to keep the aircraft. If this is something you will consider, then once FAA and NTSB release their control of your aircraft, you can remove your aircraft. Any retrieval fees and hangar fees up to the point are being paid by us.
 
Please let me know if you have any questions.
 
Natsuno Wolfe | Claims Representative, California Branch Office | Chartis Aerospace  |
Mail: P.O. Box 5550  | Alpharetta, GA  30022 |
777 S. Figueroa Street | 14th Floor | Los Angeles, CA  90017 |
Direct:  213.689.2735 | Fax:  866.690.8478  |  Cell:  213.280.5293 | http://www.chartisinsurance.com
 
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
The information in this email (and any attachments) is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use or disseminate the information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me by "Reply" command and permanently delete the original and any copies or printouts thereof. Although this email and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by Chartis Insurance or its subsidiaries or affiliates either jointly or severally, for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use.
 







Kim Blackseth, ICC, CASp
310 17th St
Oakland, CA
510-839-1760








Reply via email to