I noticed my attachments were HUGE. But in trial they were chopped down in size when they got to the Yahoo site, so I assumed that Yahoo was trimming them down. Now that I know that, I will not send them full siae any longer. I agree, that attachments are the way to email photos to the forum.
-- In [email protected], "Ed Burkhead" <e...@...> wrote: > > > Don just sent us an e-mail with a photo that makes a couple of points: > > 1. As he embedded the photo in the body of the message, rather than > "attaching" it, about half our members won't be able to see it. > > 2. As he didn't change the dpi of the photo to 72 or 96 and didn't do > <save as> to save the photo as a .jpg quality level of 3, 2, 1 or 0, the > photo came through as a 3 MegaByte message - as big as over 200 regular > messages or messages containing the photo as an attachment. > > It's very important to process that photo before sending it as an inline. > > Our new standard, adopted an hour or two ago, is to send photos as an > attachment (use the paperclip button) to your e-mail. > > Sorry to use you as an example, Don. The message came through at an > opportune time in the discussion cycle. This is a learning experience for > all of us. > > Ed >
