Bill,

You are exactly right.  Sorry for not mentioning it.

Syd


On Jun 30, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Bill BIGGS wrote:

> Syd,
>  
> I am sure you were aware but failed to mention that a C or CD 
>  
> "must not since it's original certification... continued to meet the 
> following...a maximum takeoff weight of not more than 1320lbs."
>  
>  to remain eligible for light sport
>  
> Bill 
> To: [email protected]
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:49:32 -0500
> Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Fwd: Gas Overflow and New Plane is Flying
> 
>  
> Yes, you are mistaken, Jerry.  All 415-C Ercoupes and 415-CD Ercoupes are 
> light sport.  If they have heavy empty weights, they may not have much for 
> useful loads, though.
> 
> Syd
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 10:58 PM, Jerry Ward wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> I have a question Kim, you say that the new plane is light sport class - I 
> was told that the only light sport Ercoupes were fabric covered wings.  I 
> thought that the metal ones were just too heavy to stay under the weight 
> limit of light sport.  Was I mistaken??  Jerry - with a G-model in Ferndale, 
> WA
>  
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Caliendo Dan
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 7:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [ercoupe-tech] Fwd: Gas Overflow and New Plane is Flying
> 
>  
> I suspect many of us are interested and I'm glad to hear you are getting back 
> in the air again. 
> Dan C
> 
> 
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 5:42 PM, kim Blackseth wrote:
> 
>  
> Thanks!  That was it!
> 
> When the NTSB took apart my pump on my crashed plane, they left off the 
> restrictor fitting.  I found one in my salvaged plane and I'm installing it 
> now...
> 
> I should be a FLYING member of the group again by Saturday.  As most know, 
> N2332H crashed on January 16th.  With tremendous moral, technical and in some 
> cases financial support from this group, I bought the crashed/salvaged plane 
> from the insurance company and a VERY used 415C.
> 
> Over the last six months we have built one very sound plane out of the two.  
> The new plane has a new N number (N415TB) and should be a great aircraft. 
> This new airframe is Light Sport.
> 
> We re-built a C-85 with a new 0-200 crank. It has new alternator, mags, light 
> weight starter and virtually everything that is fire wall forward is new. It 
> has metal wings, a split elevator and was extensively inspected for 
> corrosion. We added newly re-built fuel tanks, fittings and lines. All new 
> aileron and control fittings, etc are new.
> 
> We rebuilt the panel and re-did all the various stuff I needed for my 
> disability...  I'm very excited to get flying again! 
> 
> All give further reports if anyone is interested...
> 
> Kim Blackseth, ICC, CASp
> 310 17th St
> Oakland, CA
> 510-839-1760
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 3:13 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> Hey Kim: The first thing I would check is to make sure the fitting on the out 
> line of the pump has a restrictor installed. This is the fitting (generally 
> on the rear of the pump) which is highest on the pump body. It should have a 
> 45 degree fitting installed that has a restriction installed with a 1/16" 
> hole drilled in it. This allows about 7 gallons per hour of fuel to be pumped 
> from the wings to the header tank. If a fitting has been installed which does 
> not have the restrictor, then too much fuel will be pumped into the header 
> tank (more than the overflow line can handle).
> Lynn Nelsen
>  
> In a message dated 6/29/2010 5:45:34 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
> [email protected] writes:
>  
> 
> 
> 
> All...
> 
> We test flew my newly re-built 415C today and all appeared well, but one 
> detail and I'm looking for some advice...
> 
> The header tank was overflowing, as it appears the pump was filling the 
> header tank, but the overflow back to the wing tanks was not working...
> 
> What did I do wrong or what should I check??
> 
> Kim Blackseth, ICC, CASp
> 310 17th St
> Oakland, CA
> 510-839-1760
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
> inbox. See how.
> 
> 

Reply via email to