Anders, Its less maintenance mode and more 'We need to do some stuff to the central repo' before we do anything else. We are just going to be concentrating on Portious and the website for a little bit before we get back to faxien and sinan. We actually need to do that, those areas have been neglected for some time.
Thanks, Eric On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Anders Nygren <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> All, here is what we are thinking for the relatively near term on Erlware: >> > ..... >> Sinan - >> Add simple build hooks for calling into outside build scripts at >> different phases >> Dist must create releases of the new structure >> Know how to crawl the new lib structure selecting only dependencies >> that are compatible with the erts version a given Sinan instance is >> compiled for >> >> After these changes Sinan will be put into maintenance mode. >> Community patches always appreciated. >> > > I have not been following the sinan development closely but > the last time I looked (a few months ago), it looked like > it still does not handle dependencies between files properly. > > Does putting Sinan in maintenance mode mean that there are > no plans for that? > Or do You have a different definition of maintenance mode than > e.g. Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maintenance_mode > > /Anders > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
