Yep, sounds good. Martin Logan wrote: > I agree with the change, we don't use the irc channel at all and I am > sure it creates a bad impression. I say we can it. Also, yes, the > dev process is no longer applicable, we don't send patches anymore. I > think using github pull requests and reviews works well. Each dev can > fork from the main at github erlware and then send pull and review > requests. Thoughts? > > Cheers, > Martin > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Samuel<[email protected]> wrote: >> Guys, >> >> I polled the IRC archives, no one of the days I looked at had >> anything. I suggest removing the link from the developers page, since >> it may create a bad impression for possible newcomers. >> >> The patch is in erlware-site's next branch if any one wants to review >> it: 158acf7535e2d2b02656b0a256b8f2d91d1b8ee3. If no one complains, >> I'll push it to master on Wednesday (1th of Jul). >> >> BTW, now that we have git-hub, it may be worth revisiting the >> development process (we are not following right now anyway). Maybe it >> is more convenient to ask for reviews before pushing something to >> master instead of the former idea of sending all the patches to the >> list? >> >> Best regards >> -- >> Samuel >> > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
