Probably a good idea On 6/28/09, Dave Peticolas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yep, sounds good. > > Martin Logan wrote: >> I agree with the change, we don't use the irc channel at all and I am >> sure it creates a bad impression. I say we can it. Also, yes, the >> dev process is no longer applicable, we don't send patches anymore. I >> think using github pull requests and reviews works well. Each dev can >> fork from the main at github erlware and then send pull and review >> requests. Thoughts? >> >> Cheers, >> Martin >> >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Samuel<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Guys, >>> >>> I polled the IRC archives, no one of the days I looked at had >>> anything. I suggest removing the link from the developers page, since >>> it may create a bad impression for possible newcomers. >>> >>> The patch is in erlware-site's next branch if any one wants to review >>> it: 158acf7535e2d2b02656b0a256b8f2d91d1b8ee3. If no one complains, >>> I'll push it to master on Wednesday (1th of Jul). >>> >>> BTW, now that we have git-hub, it may be worth revisiting the >>> development process (we are not following right now anyway). Maybe it >>> is more convenient to ask for reviews before pushing something to >>> master instead of the former idea of sending all the patches to the >>> list? >>> >>> Best regards >>> -- >>> Samuel >>> >> >> > >> > > > > >
-- Sent from my mobile device --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
