ok samuel this sounds good. I will get it reviewed and pulled into canonical. Thanks for all the work!
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Samuel <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok I reorganised it a bit, > > * I sorted the commits so that up to tag 0.4-fixes, the API is still > the same, but the bug with escapes and the bug with negative reals are > fixed. This would be the HEAD for former API branch (i.e. next version > compatible with 0.4.0.1) > * I added a testcase for negative reals > * I then applied the incompatible change > * Copied ktj_decode to ktj_parse and changed the decode function to parse > > So next branch's HEAD is new API version, decoding binaries as strings. > > You should have a pull request for that. Forget about my former pull > request, since my next branch has diverged, so the one you have is > invalid. > > I discovered that I broke ktt_decode, since I'm not using it and I > didn't run its tests until now. I reran all my foreign tests and all > still pass, so I'm pretty confident I didn't borke anything in > ktj_parse or in ktj_encode. > > Cheers > -- > Samuel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
