I am fine with that. I had added a few more comments in that email
though, thoughts?

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Jordan Wilberding
<[email protected]> wrote:
> ecrypt it is.
>
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Tristan Sloughter
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Drop the o. ecrypt. Then its less similar? That or etomb.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Jordan Wilberding <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ecrypto seems to be available.
>>> Thanks!
>>> JW
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> crypto is already taken, that is why I went with that. What should we
>>>> call it?
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Jordan Wilberding
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > Hmm.. well cryptographic seems unreasonably long. Should we just
>>>> > rename the
>>>> > library all together?
>>>> > JW
>>>> > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> It is a fairly old application but deprecation should be easy, just
>>>> >> leave the old stuff hanging around if you are not going to use any of
>>>> >> it and then blast it in 90 days. A couple of other comments:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 1. You should not create a module called ecrypto because it has
>>>> >> nothing to do with the application name. Perhaps crytographic would
>>>> >> be
>>>> >> a better name. Any other modules should obey the prefixing rules.
>>>> >> 2. On the math module. When going through and building this it seemed
>>>> >> as though there were a number of functions that were generic just
>>>> >> math
>>>> >> and not really crypto specific, that is why I separated them out.
>>>> >> They
>>>> >> could eventually move into erlware commons. As you can see I never
>>>> >> did
>>>> >> that though so take that with a grain of salt.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Jordan Wilberding
>>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >> > I am probably going to make changes to the cryptographic API.
>>>> >> > There are 2 things I want to do. First, I want to completely remove
>>>> >> > the
>>>> >> > padded encrypt and padded decrypt for now. Second, I want to rename
>>>> >> > cg_rsa
>>>> >> > and cg_math into one single module called ecrypto or something like
>>>> >> > that.
>>>> >> > Do people think we should go through the whole deprecation process,
>>>> >> > or
>>>> >> > is
>>>> >> > this library young enough we can just do a wholesale transformation
>>>> >> > at
>>>> >> > this
>>>> >> > point?
>>>> >> > Thanks!
>>>> >> > JW
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> >> > Groups
>>>> >> > "erlware-dev" group.
>>>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> >> > [email protected].
>>>> >> > For more options, visit this group at
>>>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Martin Logan
>>>> >> Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan
>>>> >> http://twitter.com/martinjlogan
>>>> >> http://erlware.org
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> >> Groups
>>>> >> "erlware-dev" group.
>>>> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> >> [email protected].
>>>> >> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> > Groups
>>>> > "erlware-dev" group.
>>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> > [email protected].
>>>> > For more options, visit this group at
>>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Martin Logan
>>>> Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan
>>>> http://twitter.com/martinjlogan
>>>> http://erlware.org
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "erlware-dev" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "erlware-dev" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "erlware-dev" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "erlware-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>



-- 
Martin Logan
Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan
http://twitter.com/martinjlogan
http://erlware.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"erlware-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to