No problems with the name change nor the API change. I have created a fork @ https://github.com/lehoff/cryptographic where I have collected and added things (see the commit messages for details) according to the various standards on cryptography. I think it would be a waste to throw the integration of Vinoski's SHA library and my own hash random number generator plus wheel factorisation down the tubes.
If you thikn it is worth anything please contact me. Cheers, Torben On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 17:05, Jordan Wilberding <[email protected]>wrote: > I am probably going to make changes to the cryptographic API. > > There are 2 things I want to do. First, I want to completely remove the > padded encrypt and padded decrypt for now. Second, I want to rename cg_rsa > and cg_math into one single module called ecrypto or something like that. > > Do people think we should go through the whole deprecation process, or is > this library young enough we can just do a wholesale transformation at this > point? > > Thanks! > JW > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > -- http://www.linkedin.com/in/torbenhoffmann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
