I am all for it, think that is an elegant spec. going 1.0 does imply a certain level of stability and testing. With all the new functionality being developed we should do an audit of our testing infrastructure to ensure we have met a high standard. I think we are fairly solid at this point. We should just to a check though so we all are on the same page there.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like to suggest that Projects (like sinan and faxien) under > the erlware umbrella make use of the following spec for versioning. I > would like to be consistant with this in our projects. > > http://semver.org/ > > Let me know what you folks think. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > > -- Martin Logan Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan http://twitter.com/martinjlogan http://erlware.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
