That was the point of the 4 places versioning scheme. With 4 digits you can imply < 1.0 while still being able to represent major versions by bumping the second number. Either way, I think what we want to do is write some tests to prove we can handle -beta version tags across our tool set.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Jordan Wilberding <[email protected]> wrote: > So Eric brought this question up before, what does version 1.0 really imply? > Does it imply stability? If so, how do we release some betas with new > functionality for testing without going to 1.0? > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I would like to suggest that Projects (like sinan and faxien) under >> the erlware umbrella make use of the following spec for versioning. I >> would like to be consistant with this in our projects. >> >> http://semver.org/ >> >> Let me know what you folks think. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "erlware-dev" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > -- Martin Logan Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan http://twitter.com/martinjlogan http://erlware.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
