ec_BS ;-) On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with martin, I think of it as an optimization that gets used > where needed, so I tend not to use it much. I just want us to be > explicit about what type of string a string module is focused on. Btw > ec_binary_string seams pretty long. > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]> wrote: >> lets have a ec_binary_string module as well. I consider binary strings >> an optimization typically and don't normally use them. >> >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jordan Wilberding >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This is a touch choice. My personal opinion is binary strings, but that >>> hasn't been well adopted yet. Any reason we can't support both? >>> Thanks! >>> JW >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> As we are gearing up for new development and you are mentioning >>>> strings I think its probably a good idea to explicitly settle on the >>>> strings we are going to us. Lists or Binaries? I suspect lists and >>>> thats what I would vote for but it is something we should come to >>>> agreement on. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > All, I pushed code to my master branch that contains two new modules. >>>> > The first is ec_semver which contains a function for comparing semver >>>> > strings. The second is ec_string which starts the module for string >>>> > handling. I added a function that compares pretty much any resonable >>>> > version string out there. These functions are particularly useful for >>>> > sorting by versions. >>>> > >>>> > Please take a look. >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Martin Logan >>>> > Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan >>>> > http://twitter.com/martinjlogan >>>> > http://erlware.org >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> > Groups "erlware-dev" group. >>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> > [email protected]. >>>> > For more options, visit this group at >>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "erlware-dev" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "erlware-dev" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Martin Logan >> Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan >> http://twitter.com/martinjlogan >> http://erlware.org >> >
-- Martin Logan Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan http://twitter.com/martinjlogan http://erlware.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
