ha ha - I am foggy headed too so I can definitely understand On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Jordan Wilberding <[email protected]> wrote: > You can't do that to me when I'm on cold medicine ;) > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Martin Logan <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Was joke, yes >> >> On Mar 13, 2011 7:36 AM, "Jordan Wilberding" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Or I'd even go for ec_string and ec_bstring >> > >> > I just prefer things that are similar to look similar. Seeing ec_string >> > and >> > ec_bs wouldn't imply they are similar. >> > >> > JW >> > >> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Jordan Wilberding >> > <[email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> I'd prefer >> >> >> >> ec_str and ec_bin_str >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> >> JW >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Martin Logan >> >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> >> >>> ec_BS ;-) >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Eric Merritt >> >>> <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > I agree with martin, I think of it as an optimization that gets used >> >>> > where needed, so I tend not to use it much. I just want us to be >> >>> > explicit about what type of string a string module is focused on. >> >>> > Btw >> >>> > ec_binary_string seams pretty long. >> >>> > >> >>> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Martin Logan >> >>> > <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> lets have a ec_binary_string module as well. I consider binary >> >>> >> strings >> >>> >> an optimization typically and don't normally use them. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Jordan Wilberding >> >>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> This is a touch choice. My personal opinion is binary strings, but >> >>> that >> >>> >>> hasn't been well adopted yet. Any reason we can't support both? >> >>> >>> Thanks! >> >>> >>> JW >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Eric Merritt >> >>> >>> <[email protected] >> >>> > >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> As we are gearing up for new development and you are mentioning >> >>> >>>> strings I think its probably a good idea to explicitly settle on >> >>> >>>> the >> >>> >>>> strings we are going to us. Lists or Binaries? I suspect lists >> >>> >>>> and >> >>> >>>> thats what I would vote for but it is something we should come to >> >>> >>>> agreement on. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Martin Logan < >> >>> [email protected]> >> >>> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >>>> > All, I pushed code to my master branch that contains two new >> >>> modules. >> >>> >>>> > The first is ec_semver which contains a function for comparing >> >>> semver >> >>> >>>> > strings. The second is ec_string which starts the module for >> >>> >>>> > string >> >>> >>>> > handling. I added a function that compares pretty much any >> >>> resonable >> >>> >>>> > version string out there. These functions are particularly >> >>> >>>> > useful >> >>> for >> >>> >>>> > sorting by versions. >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > Please take a look. >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > -- >> >>> >>>> > Martin Logan >> >>> >>>> > Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan >> >>> >>>> > http://twitter.com/martinjlogan >> >>> >>>> > http://erlware.org >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > -- >> >>> >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> >>> >>>> > Google >> >>> >>>> > Groups "erlware-dev" group. >> >>> >>>> > To post to this group, send email to >> >>> >>>> > [email protected]. >> >>> >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >>> >>>> > [email protected]. >> >>> >>>> > For more options, visit this group at >> >>> >>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> -- >> >>> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> >>> >>>> Google >> >>> Groups >> >>> >>>> "erlware-dev" group. >> >>> >>>> To post to this group, send email to >> >>> >>>> [email protected]. >> >>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >>> >>>> [email protected]. >> >>> >>>> For more options, visit this group at >> >>> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> -- >> >>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >>> Groups >> >>> >>> "erlware-dev" group. >> >>> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> >>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >>> >>> [email protected]. >> >>> >>> For more options, visit this group at >> >>> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> Martin Logan >> >>> >> Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan >> >>> >> http://twitter.com/martinjlogan >> >>> >> http://erlware.org >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Martin Logan >> >>> Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan >> >>> http://twitter.com/martinjlogan >> >>> http://erlware.org >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >
-- Martin Logan Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan http://twitter.com/martinjlogan http://erlware.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
