Hi Jordan, I have given it a try and described generators alone - try to see if it was that sort of description you were looking for!
Cheers, Torben On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:28, Torben Hoffmann <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:28, Jordan Wilberding <[email protected]>wrote: > >> One quick question I have is, how much overhead in terms of time for >> testing does using PBT add vs regular xUnit methods? > > > I have not been an avid unit tester, but my feeling is that you actually > spend less time with PBT. > > Raghav, does that correlate with your experiences??? > > >> >> This document is a great start, and I think it covers basically most of >> the things that need to be covered. I however offer a few suggestions: >> >> 1. Remove references to both Martin and Eric. I am sure they will be nice >> enough to let you use your words verbatim(or close to) without putting up a >> fight. Just focus on the concepts, not where the idea came from. >> > > I have no problem with that - a quick nod from Martin and Eric will do the > trick for me! > > >> >> 2. I would cover generators and add at a slightly higher level under the >> title PBT Explained or something like that. I would then save the unit >> test->PBT conversion for the last section and actually show in detail of how >> an actual unit test would be converted to a PBT. >> > > I will give that a try so we have a levelled introduction of the concepts > before we dive in. > > >> >> 3. Just a quibble with the first sentence. I wouldn't consider this a >> short document, and it is only going to grow :) >> > > So true - it will be changed!! > > kThanks, > Torben > > >> >> >> Thanks! >> JW >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Jordan Wilberding <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Torben, >>> >>> Could you give me edit rights for the document? I want to go through and >>> clean up some grammar stuff. >>> >>> My username is [email protected] >>> >>> I am working on generating actual technical comments for you >>> >>> Cheers! >>> Jordan Wilberding >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Torben Hoffmann < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have followed the advice from my colleague Raghav and moved our work >>>> in progress document to Google Docs in order to ease the review process. >>>> >>>> Please go to >>>> PropertyBasedTesting101 - >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1kTLvLKDpYBBKgo0S0W4sXUI5-BzAIDYFFfqqklEawao >>>> and submit your comments and suggestions. >>>> >>>> If there is anything you do not understand you should really give us a >>>> hint now since you will not be able to spot the weak parts of the tutorial >>>> once you have learned a bit more!!! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Torben >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "erlware-dev" group. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>> [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > http://www.linkedin.com/in/torbenhoffmann > -- http://www.linkedin.com/in/torbenhoffmann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
