Agreed. Thanks! JW
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]>wrote: > After giving it much thought I have come to agree with Dave about > erlware-mode deprecation. There just isn't any reason for us to have a > complete mode any more. The erlang mode has all of our fixes and a lot > of additional functionality besides. > > That doesn't mean we need to get rid of everything. erlang mode allows > us to provide a custom skeletons file, and I think we should do that. > Our new style is much more lean and clear then the default, but I > think thats all we really need to supply. > > So I propose that we trim erlware-mode down just to the sinan support > and the custom skel file along with instructions on how to use them > with erlang-mode. Then we get the benefit of continued development of > erlang mode along with the things we actually care about. Thats my > proposal in any case. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
