I guess it depends on what you are looking at it for. It seems designed expressly to replace embedded ruby in rails applications, I guess in that it may be acceptable. However, as a templating competitor to markdown or the others I don't think it really compares. As for the dynamic content, I suspect there are better ways to go for that.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Martin Logan <[email protected]> wrote: > haml is quite powerful, comparing it to markdown and others is not > quite fair. It is really an erb replacement and thus gives you the > power to use with ruby backends to create dynamic content. Haml also > ties into CSS is a way taht I am not sure others address. I think that > looking at a haml based site could make sense if we ever want to add > more than just static content but still keep things relatively simple. > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> wrote: >> Guys, >> >> we have been talking about moving back to a simple static generation >> for the erlware site to simplify things. Here are some candidates >> >> http://webgen.rubyforge.org/ >> http://sphinx.pocoo.org/ >> http://gitorious.org/webber >> http://nanoc.stoneship.org/ >> http://staticmatic.rubyforge.org/ >> http://webby.rubyforge.org/ >> >> I suggest we go with webgen, its maintained we have used it before and >> it mostly seems to work. Better yet you can use markdown or textile as >> the templating language which is nice. I suggest we stay away from the >> haml based ones. I guess I could think of a worse templating language >> then haml but I would really have to try. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "erlware-dev" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. >> >> > > > > -- > Martin Logan > Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan > http://twitter.com/martinjlogan > http://erlware.org > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
