I will let you guys make the final call. I don't work enough in the web area, especially ruby web area, to know what is best.
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]>wrote: > I guess it depends on what you are looking at it for. It seems > designed expressly to replace embedded ruby in rails applications, I > guess in that it may be acceptable. However, as a templating > competitor to markdown or the others I don't think it really compares. > As for the dynamic content, I suspect there are better ways to go for > that. > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Martin Logan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > haml is quite powerful, comparing it to markdown and others is not > > quite fair. It is really an erb replacement and thus gives you the > > power to use with ruby backends to create dynamic content. Haml also > > ties into CSS is a way taht I am not sure others address. I think that > > looking at a haml based site could make sense if we ever want to add > > more than just static content but still keep things relatively simple. > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Guys, > >> > >> we have been talking about moving back to a simple static generation > >> for the erlware site to simplify things. Here are some candidates > >> > >> http://webgen.rubyforge.org/ > >> http://sphinx.pocoo.org/ > >> http://gitorious.org/webber > >> http://nanoc.stoneship.org/ > >> http://staticmatic.rubyforge.org/ > >> http://webby.rubyforge.org/ > >> > >> I suggest we go with webgen, its maintained we have used it before and > >> it mostly seems to work. Better yet you can use markdown or textile as > >> the templating language which is nice. I suggest we stay away from the > >> haml based ones. I guess I could think of a worse templating language > >> then haml but I would really have to try. > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "erlware-dev" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > >> For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Martin Logan > > Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan > > http://twitter.com/martinjlogan > > http://erlware.org > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "erlware-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlware-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
