I think Eric's hidden desire is for others to participate (code
review, contribute, etc). Although I agree with Martin's points about
having a "right channel" for this, publishing to this mailing list
would at least increase activity, which is good. Can always stop if it
becomes a "problem".

Salomon

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]> wrote:
> You are not the audience :)  You are excited about sending your
> patches out. There are a few people that want to see your patches, but
> the majority don't have plans to develop directly in sinan, and even
> if they did, the patches coming out require a lot of work to gain
> appropriate context on.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just a follow up. We have done this in the past. Back in 2008, we
>> where sending patches to the list. I was looking at the archive today
>> and the patches seemed to stimulate a lot of discussions and we seem
>> to have gotten a ton more patches then we do now. I would like to see
>> that happen again. The list is dead at the moment and though a ton of
>> development is going on across several projects thats not apparent.
>> Thats not the purpose of sending the patches to the list, the purpose
>> is publishing change. However, it is a very nice side benefit and its
>> something that I see happen in any organization that uses this
>> approach.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I disagree, of course, its not spam. And it is very contextually
>>> relevant to the erlware-dev list. Though I wouldn't suggest it for the
>>> erlware-questions. I am assuming here that the folks on erlware-dev
>>> are either participating in or interested in erlware development. That
>>> given I can't imagine how change to the code base, or change that
>>> people are submitting to the code base isn't relevant. And for those
>>> folks that want to be on the dev list, but not really interested in
>>> development, the subjects are tagged and hence they can get out of it
>>> fairly easily.
>>>
>>> I am not a big fan of a seperate list, it defeats the purpose.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Martin Logan <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> I am not a fan of it. It turns the dev-list into a spam list. The
>>>> patches are not contextual enough for most people on the list to get
>>>> value out of and therefore are not useful to the majority of folks. We
>>>> have a separate list for that sort of commication that I think people
>>>> can sign up for if they want to see this traffic.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Guys,
>>>>>
>>>>>  I am a big fan of patches going to the dev mailing list, in the style
>>>>> of the git mailing list or the kernel. I think its a great way to
>>>>> interact with the community and peers. I do this at in my professional
>>>>> life and want to get back to it with open source projects. So I am
>>>>> seriously considering moving back to pushing these through the this
>>>>> mailing list. For those of you not wanting to receive them, each
>>>>> commit email will have a tagged subject line in the form of
>>>>> [*project-name* PATCH] and so should be easy to send off into your
>>>>> bulk mail folder or trash. I figured I would poll the community, and
>>>>> if people didn't explode startup with the next set of public patches
>>>>> to one of the erlware projects.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "erlware-dev" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Martin Logan
>>>> Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan
>>>> http://twitter.com/martinjlogan
>>>> http://erlware.org
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "erlware-dev" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "erlware-dev" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Logan
> Erlang & OTP in Action (Manning) http://manning.com/logan
> http://twitter.com/martinjlogan
> http://erlware.org
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "erlware-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"erlware-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to