hey man. I am a big paryher. I paryh all the time.

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Tristan Sloughter
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Eric, are you doing paryhing now? :)
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Jordan Wilberding <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Must have been some "paryh" ;)
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Eric Merritt <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I, am at a weekend long bayvhekor paryh
>>>
>>> On Oct 15, 2011 4:47 PM, "Tristan Sloughter"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Any chance you'll be doing that sometime soon :).
>>>> I got my agner stuffed worked out and kerl working, the last piece for
>>>> having an awesome Erlang deployment setup to DotCloud is getting this sinan
>>>> to work.
>>>>
>>>> 2011/10/15 Tristan Sloughter <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Great, thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/10/15 Eric Merritt <[email protected]>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That had to be github. I will try to upload anotjet
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 15, 2011 12:38 PM, "Tristan Sloughter"
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The download is not working for me
>>>>>> > from https://github.com/erlware/sinan/downloads
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > It gives some weird error about xml.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 2011/10/15 Eric Merritt <[email protected]>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I put it at the erlware sinan project not mine
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Oct 15, 2011 12:01 PM, "Tristan Sloughter"
>>>>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Also, what happened to the sinan download on github?
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Tristan Sloughter
>>>>>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> Running 'sinan build' on a project is giving me the error below.
>>>>>> >> >> Any ideas?
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> escript: exception error: undefined function
>>>>>> >> >> sin_fs_resolver:format_exception/1
>>>>>> >> >>   in function  sinan:do_task_full/3
>>>>>> >> >>   in call from sinan:do_task/3
>>>>>> >> >>   in call from sinan:do_build/2
>>>>>> >> >>   in call from escript:run/2
>>>>>> >> >>   in call from escript:start/1
>>>>>> >> >>   in call from init:start_it/1
>>>>>> >> >>   in call from init:start_em/1
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Eric Merritt
>>>>>> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>> Ok. I just uploaded a version that does the printing I talked
>>>>>> >> >>> about. You can download it at your convenience.
>>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >>> On 10/06/11 at 09:50am, Tristan Sloughter wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>> > Yup, I do have R14B03 through brew which is then under
>>>>>> >> >>> > /usr/local/Cellar and
>>>>>> >> >>> > linked to.
>>>>>> >> >>> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Eric Merritt
>>>>>> >> >>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > Out of curiousty your /usr/local/lib/erlang wouldn't happen
>>>>>> >> >>> > > to be
>>>>>> >> >>> > > built up with symlinks would it? I just encountered your
>>>>>> >> >>> > > problem
>>>>>> >> >>> > > because i install R14B04 and I actually use stow to handle
>>>>>> >> >>> > > these kinds
>>>>>> >> >>> > > of installs. so while /usr/local/lib/erlang/lib looks like
>>>>>> >> >>> > > it has
>>>>>> >> >>> > > everything in it sinan was actually resolving from
>>>>>> >> >>> > > /var/stow/otp_R14B04 while cucumberl and proper where in
>>>>>> >> >>> > > /var/stow/otp_R14B03. Just because of the way sinan was
>>>>>> >> >>> > > searching.
>>>>>> >> >>> > >
>>>>>> >> >>> > >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > On 10/05/11 at 01:27pm, Tristan Sloughter wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > Ok, thanks. I'll poke around tonight.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Eric Merritt
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > <[email protected]>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > Thats not sinan, Its escript. Sinan doesnt have any
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > options about
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > doing things differently unfortunately. You can't
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > actually start a
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > release in escript because escript is a release and its
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > already
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > started by the time you run your actual script. Right
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > now escript is a
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > bit hacky for that reason.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > The long term fix is to finish up jeringa or the OTP
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > guys finish up
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > stand alone erlang. In the short term you can use
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > escript and start
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > the release manually. It sucks but its the only option.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Tristan Sloughter
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > Cool.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > And so the 'sinan escript' feature relies on being
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > able to call a
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > function:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > project:main/1
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > Correct?
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > It would be great if instead it could just start the
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > target system :)
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > Tristan
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Eric Merritt
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > > <[email protected]
>>>>>> >> >>> > > >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> Ok. thats really good to know. I think what is going
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> on is that
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> because things are being distributed as an escript
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> code:lib_dir
>>>>>> >> >>> > > isn't
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> actually returning the lib dir of erts. Its
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> returning the lib dir of
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> the escript which isn't what we want at all.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> I need to think about that a little bit. To get it
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> fixed. On a side
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> note, sinan now respects the ERL_LIBS env variable,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> and that
>>>>>> >> >>> > > dep_dirs
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> thing you just saw.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Tristan Sloughter
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> > Hah, that fixed it!
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> > 2011/10/5 Eric Merritt <[email protected]>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> Thats good and its bad. Its good in that the
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> version parser is
>>>>>> >> >>> > > not
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> screwed up. Its bad in that its not finding
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> proper as it should.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> Hmm, this may be a pathing issue. I am not sure
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> they we can test
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > that.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> add a piece to your config that looks as follows
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> {dep_dirs, ["<path to where ever proper is>"]}.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> so if proper is in usr/local/lib/erlang/lib it
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> would look like
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> {dep_dirs, ["/usr/local/lib/erlang/lib"]}.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> Lets see what that results in.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Tristan Sloughter
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > I got rid of the other proper and installed
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > proper 1.0 from
>>>>>> >> >>> > > master,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > same
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > thing:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > starting: depends
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > Unable to resolve compile time dependencies,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > probably do to the
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > following
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > constraints:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >  application proper in the project
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >  constraint on proper with constraints [proper]
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > originating
>>>>>> >> >>> > > from
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > these
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > application(s) ['__top_level__']
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > build problem sin_task_depends:211 [{failed,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >                           {possible_culprit,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >                               [proper,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >                                {proper,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >  {set,1,16,16,8,80,48,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >  {[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > [],[],[],[]},
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >                                        {{[],[],
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >  [proper],
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >  [],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >                                          []}}},
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >  {set,1,16,16,8,80,48,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >  {[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > [],[],[],[]},
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >  {{[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],[],
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >  [],[],[],
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > >  ['__top_level__']}}}}]}}]
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Eric Merritt
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > <[email protected]>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> > wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> This is the new dep solver stuff. I am
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> actually happy you are
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> hitting
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> this error. its going to help get the error
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> messaging right.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> So what its saying there is that there is a
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> dependency change
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> starting
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> at proper that is not being satisfied. So it
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> might be proper
>>>>>> >> >>> > > or
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> something that proper depends on. (Its hard
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> for the system to
>>>>>> >> >>> > > know
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> exactly in a back tracing search senario).
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> Hmmm. I wonder if the 'alpha2' is the problem.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> That could be a
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > bug,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> I
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> may have to do some better version parsing. In
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> any case,  Do
>>>>>> >> >>> > > me a
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> favor. There is a 1.0 version of proper out.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> Try installing
>>>>>> >> >>> > > that
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > and
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> lets see what happens
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> https://github.com/manopapad/proper.git
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> You should probably use that anyway, its quite
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> a bit more
>>>>>> >> >>> > > advanced
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> then the version you have.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> Eventually I want to break these things out
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> into plugins so
>>>>>> >> >>> > > you if
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> you
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> dont need proper you dont have to have it.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> oh and nuke your old proper.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> Thanks for bearing with me in this. You are my
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> first non-me
>>>>>> >> >>> > > user
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > of
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> this version of sinan.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Tristan
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> Sloughter
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > Note that the config file must be named
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > sinan.config and not
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > sinan.cfg.
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > Once I got that fixed I get what looks to be
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > complaining I
>>>>>> >> >>> > > don't
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > have
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > proper. But I do:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > /usr/local/lib/erlang/lib/proper-0.0.1alpha2/
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > λ sinan build
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > starting: depends
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > Unable to resolve compile time dependencies,
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > probably do to
>>>>>> >> >>> > > the
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > following
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> > constraints:
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > > >> >> >> >  application proper in the project
>>>>>> >> >>> > > > >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "erlware-dev" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "erlware-dev" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "erlware-dev" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "erlware-dev" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "erlware-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"erlware-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/erlware-dev?hl=en.

Reply via email to