Well not a redesign of the framework -- that'd be a pretty stupid thing to say. I meant a redesign of erlyweb.org as was mentioned earlier. As for the name, it doesn't necessarily need to tell you what the project is about, does it? I just think a more appealing name would help on the marketing end, which is a crucial part of anything if it is to be successful.
On Dec 6, 1:11 pm, David King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think a redesign definitely is in order -- also, maybe consider > > renaming the project? I've never liked the name erlyweb, it just > > sounds kind of gross. Unfortunately aesthetics is definitely > > something people take into consideration when discovering new things. > > Although it might not be important to a lot of us, just look at rails, > > django, spring, etc. Nicer looking websites, better sounding names. > > Just a thought. > > The name is fine; it's an erlang web framework, and that's clear from > the name. > > If you totally rewrote and renamed it, it wouldn't be erlyweb anyway, > so feel free to do so, choice in the web framework area is always > good. But please leave erlyweb alone. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlyweb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
