In much the same way that the Java community has jEverything, I see erl* names being a common pattern. I'm not much in favor of that as a whole. It could just as easily be "gazelle" or whatever. That said, I don't think it's a big deal either way.
On Dec 7, 2007 8:40 AM, Simon Chappell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2007 9:15 AM, Ghalib Suleiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > For what it's worth, I think Erlyweb is a great name, and should stay > > as it is :) > > > > On Dec 7, 12:34 pm, "Yariv Sadan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's funny, most people I've spoken to have liked the name 'ErlyWeb.' > > > You're the first person to have expressed such strong dislike for it. > > I'm fine with the name, but I'd vote for more beginner documentation > before any other changes. (And I mean BEGINNER ... right from the > initial install) > > I did like the suggested site redesign layout, but I agree with using > a less harsh colour than red. :-) > > Simon > > -- > simonpeter.org | simonpeter.com | newlife-upc.org > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "erlyweb" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/erlyweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
