At 08:39 AM 10/2/2002 -0700, you wrote: >Hi ... > >Two recent stories on Space.com caught my eye: > > http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/seti_021001.html > >This is about the upgrades to both the telescope (movine to Parkes) >and the software (integration with other projects) used for the >Seti@Home client. Of particular interest is their opening up the >software to other number-intensive scientific applications. We have >discussed an "ERPS@Home" project to do flight simulations but have gotten >far on it because other projects had a higher priority. Perhaps we >won't have to write all the code, just a module.
I reitterate my contention that there is nothing useful to be done with distributed processing at our level of rocketry. I might even go so far as to say ANY level of rocketry. Just because you have access to a hammer doesn't make everything into a nail... John Carmack _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
