On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:36:20 -0600, John Carmack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If he fails to give us a written response in the specified time again, he >may just get in some trouble, although there aren't any specified recourses >against the FAA not living up to its obligations. I would like "If they >don't reply to your waiver request in 90 days after acknowledged receipt, >you have implicit permission to fly." :-) Implicit permission doesn't carry much weight, legally - as in, none. I would continue to push for an answer, even if it's, "No," since you have an alternative. In general, that's the trouble with airspace waivers. FAA has no deadline for issuing or declining them, and can sit on them indefinitely for any reason, or for no reason. -R -- "...And the last thing I remember is asking, 'What could go wrong?'" _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
