>> However, if you do have some sacrificial hardware, and
can think of a
>>cheap way of shaking it to see what comes lose, and have
the hours to spare,
>>I think it would be in the direction of goodness to shake
it. If you're
>>already flying something, high resolution accelerometer
data from flights can
>>stand in for computer model predictions--the goal is for
the test regime to
>>exceed the envelope of the flight regime.
>
>Exceed? Oh boy. Anyone know a cheap way to produce in
excess of 5 g
>+/- 10 g, at 40 Hz? I wouldn't be a bit surprised if that
kind of
>abuse is what spoofed the baro altimeter last weekend. Hm,
a platform
>connected to a cam on a motor on a centrifuge in a vacuum
chamber?
>Sounds expensive. :-)
I-beam -> hammer/weight -> cam -> motor
why that expensive ... sounds like something
for junkyard wars ...
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
