Perhaps a paint shaker on a merry go round? I'm sure you could recoup the
costs by charging thrill seekers for rides ;-)
All seriousness aside though, do you have to shake the whole machine? I
certainly would want to check out all relays for false triggering. I'd give the
circuitry a work out too. If you could go fro 90% to 94% by testing individual
parts, would this be realistic?
Randall Clague wrote:
> Exceed? Oh boy. Anyone know a cheap way to produce in excess of 5 g
> +/- 10 g, at 40 Hz? I wouldn't be a bit surprised if that kind of
> abuse is what spoofed the baro altimeter last weekend. Hm, a platform
> connected to a cam on a motor on a centrifuge in a vacuum chamber?
> Sounds expensive. :-)
>
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>----<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
........ Alex Fraser N3DER .........
......... [EMAIL PROTECTED] .......
[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^<
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
