"Paul F. Dietz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
I believe his objection to using plants has to do with the introduction of more CO2 into the atmosphere, not whether or not plants should be killed.Ben Zarzycki wrote:The point of electrolysis is not that it is cheaper (although it may be if we had an abundance of clean energy such as solar cells). The point is that is creates a clean "hydrogen cycle" that is not dependent on plants. Water is split. Water is made. No intermediary steps. This is not the case for any other method.
Why is 'not using plants' a desideratum? What are we, some religious sect that cannot tolerate the killing of our leafy brethren?
Tony Fredericks "Mind that bus!"
Amateur Rocket Scientist "What Bus?"
E.R.P.S. Member SPLAT!! - Arnold Rimmer
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
