I guess you are talking about illegal recreational drugs as opposed to a corporation helping pay for prescription drugs. The laws are so strange.
Randall Clague wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:27:32 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >2. Regarding REGULATORY ISSUES, Hugh Daniel pointed out, upon > >learning that ERPS is a corporation, that California law requires all > >corporations to have a drug policy. The law doesn't say what that policy > >has to be, just that there has to be one. After some discussion, the > >matter was tabled until the next meeting. > > You are SO diplomatic. :-) > > -R > > -- > "You haven't been lost until you've been lost at Mach 3." > -- Paul Crickmore > _______________________________________________ > ERPS-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>----<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< ........ Alex Fraser N3DER ......... ......... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ....... [~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^< _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
