Alex Fraser wrote:
I guess you are talking about illegal recreational drugs as opposed to a
corporation helping pay for prescription drugs. The laws are so strange.
Probably not as strange as some of the suggestions at the meeting I'll wager
;-)
Randall Clague wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:27:32 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Regarding REGULATORY ISSUES, Hugh Daniel pointed out, upon
learning that ERPS is a corporation, that California law requires all
corporations to have a drug policy. The law doesn't say what that policy
has to be, just that there has to be one. After some discussion, the
matter was tabled until the next meeting.
You are SO diplomatic. :-)
-R
--
"You haven't been lost until you've been lost at Mach 3."
-- Paul Crickmore
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
--
----<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
........ Alex Fraser N3DER .........
......... [EMAIL PROTECTED] .......
[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^</\-[~]_>^<
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
