[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I saw your announcement for the last meeting, identifying it as
> #226, I thought: "GOOD-O! He's backed out all the extra incrementings
> of the sequence number."
>
> Comes now the announcement for #252, and it tells me, "Wrong!" Or,
> in the immortal words of Niven & Pournelle, "That has been found not to
> be the case."
>
> How can we get this matter properly resolved?
That was my mistake. The script that sends out the meeting
announcements has a base value and I forgot to increment it New Years
Day - so for week 1 of 2003, it used the base for week 1 of 2002. This
week will be meeting #252, as reflected in the announcement. Sorry for
the confusion.
Michael
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Wallis KF6SPF (408) 396-9037 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
