On 15 Jan 2003, at 7:59, Michael Wallis wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > When I saw your announcement for the last meeting, identifying it as
> > #226, I thought: "GOOD-O! He's backed out all the extra incrementings
> > of the sequence number."
> >
> > Comes now the announcement for #252, and it tells me, "Wrong!" Or,
> > in the immortal words of Niven & Pournelle, "That has been found not to be
> > the case."
> >
> > How can we get this matter properly resolved?
>
> That was my mistake. The script that sends out the meeting
> announcements has a base value and I forgot to increment it New Years
> Day - so for week 1 of 2003, it used the base for week 1 of 2002. This
> week will be meeting #252, as reflected in the announcement. Sorry for
> the confusion.
>
How does your script handle the months with five Thursdays in them?
I think there are some unwanted increments taking place then.
Chris
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
