On Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:09:23 -0800, Sean Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>NASA's statements about being unable to do anything about damage to the >TPS *deserve* to be met with shock. They themselves stated that they >were flying a nominal reentry trajectory, implying that they could >change the trajectory to perhaps lessen the danger. They say not. Given the lack of redundancy in the TPS, I'm inclined to believe them. -R _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
