On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:04:35 -0800 (PST), Adrian Tymes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>minimal human inspections that in practice are rarely more than formalities

<rant>

Thinking of safety inspections as formalities is a good way to get
people killed.  A safety inspection is not a formality.  It is an
integral part of any competent operation, as anyone who has crashed
because of an inadequate preflight will tell you.

To rephrase: a safety inspection is not a formality designed to assure
that everything is shipshape.  A safety inspection, properly
performed, is a technical procedure performed by a hostile SOB who is
looking for an excuse to ground you.  If he fails, you get to fly, and
you're safe.  If he succeeds, you don't get to fly, and you're still
safe.

How detailed you want the QI SOB to inspect, and how often, and
operational matters affecting your bottom line - but treating safety
inspections as formalities affects your bottom line much more
negatively, by wrecking your ship, destroying your cargo, killing your
passengers, and making you look like a real idiot on Fox News.

</rant>

-R

--
Every complex, difficult problem has a simple,
easy solution - which is wrong.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to