If plug nozzles actually work to allow automatic altitude compensation, it seems like it should be possible to do an SSTO with blowdown pressurization and light tanks.

My reasoning is that the bulk of the delta-V that an SSTO needs is generated outside the atmosphere, and with no back pressure, a very large expansion ratio nozzle can extract essentially the same Isp regardless of chamber pressure. If you had a huge plug nozzle over the entire base of a vehicle, you could start out with a 150 psi tank pressure and get a crappy 200 or so Isp at sea level (98% peroxide / kerosene), but it would rise to 300 when out of the atmosphere. The time spent at the lower Isp is not actually all that great -- under 20% of the time in the sensible atmosphere, with the full Isp at the end where you really need it.

If you have an engine capable of deep throttling, say, with a moveable pintle injector, starting with some ullage and letting the pressure decay to 20% of its starting pressure probably isn't a bad thing at all, since you are going to throw away 95% of your mass by that point. Making a pressurization subsystem just go away is a big deal optimization.

Extremely low engine pressures also make the cooling task a lot easier -- the plug nozzle could almost certainly live with a pretty lightweight heat barrier / high temp metal fabrication for a six minute burn to orbit.

Composite tanks with a 200 psi burst pressure can be fabricated with SSTO mas fractions fairly easily.

John Carmack

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to