Yup , another thing to think about is if you have a lot of nozzles in your
100 ratio plug , after 50,000 ft you shut off 1/2 of them , Instant 200
ratio ! ( Isp 300 to 340 ) Not sure I like the idea of blowdown, by the time
you add the extra volume of tank , it weighs the same as the pressurizing
system .

Kevin Bollinger


----- Original Message -----
From: "John Carmack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 1:37 PM
Subject: [ERPS] blowdown SSTO


> If plug nozzles actually work to allow automatic altitude compensation, it
> seems like it should be possible to do an SSTO with blowdown
pressurization
> and light tanks.
>
> My reasoning is that the bulk of the delta-V that an SSTO needs is
> generated outside the atmosphere, and with no back pressure, a very large
> expansion ratio nozzle can extract essentially the same Isp regardless of
> chamber pressure.  If you had a huge plug nozzle over the entire base of a
> vehicle, you could start out with a 150 psi tank pressure and get a crappy
> 200 or so Isp at sea level (98% peroxide / kerosene), but it would rise to
> 300 when out of the atmosphere.  The time spent at the lower Isp is not
> actually all that great -- under 20% of the time in the sensible
> atmosphere, with the full Isp at the end where you really need it.
>
> If you have an engine capable of deep throttling, say, with a moveable
> pintle injector, starting with some ullage and letting the pressure decay
> to 20% of its starting pressure probably isn't a bad thing at all, since
> you are going to throw away 95% of your mass by that point.  Making a
> pressurization subsystem just go away is a big deal optimization.
>
> Extremely low engine pressures also make the cooling task a lot easier --
> the plug nozzle could almost certainly live with a pretty lightweight heat
> barrier / high temp metal fabrication for a six minute burn to orbit.
>
> Composite tanks with a 200 psi burst pressure can be fabricated with SSTO
> mas fractions fairly easily.
>
> John Carmack
>
> _______________________________________________
> ERPS-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
>

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to