Earl Colby Pottinger wrote:
> considering the good results John Cramer is getting with adding a fuel > to a peroxide solution (see http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/ > Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=217 ) is ERPS considering going that route > too? It would cut down on the amount of spraging needed. > > Even if ERPS continues to freeze out high purity H2O2 for future bi/ > mono designs, it looks like a short cut to do some high temperature > testing of the catalyst right now. > > Earl Colby Pottinger
ERPS currrently has no plans to go to a peroxide/fuel mixture that I'm aware of. We are considering various bipropellent options but have not decided what will be tested or when. Right now, we're just focusing on getting a supply of usable HTP. Once we have that, we'll look at various things to do with it (though I suspect using it for engine tests and monoprop vehicle flights will be the main priority for some time).
Michael
The primary point of the mixed monoprop is that you don't have to worry about getting usable HTP at all, you just mix 50% food grade peroxide with industrial methanol, and you are done.
John Carmack
_______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
