Alex Fraser wrote: > What is the sequence or plan to get the Gizmo Copter Hardware > transitioned into POGO? When will the actual real computer controller > get in the real POGO airframe. I'm not trying to force a schedule or > hurry anyone up, I'm looking at the process and not seeing the plan. > Is there a cutoff point for Gizmo copter? Will the flight computer be > used to test the engines? Are the folks involved in building > GizmoCopter's airframe the same folks doing the POGO airframe? If they > are not won't they go through post partum depression? "Oh my poor baby" > in the hands of the POGO brutes. I am being unserious here, but in > industry wouldn't the old crew get laid off? I have been on enough > projects to know that when a crew gets toward the end of a project a > little "milking the cow" happens. THIS IS human nature and if you don't > make sure Gizmo folks transition in the organization, officially > transition, they will not let their baby go. This is what you might call > organisational slosh.
There's enough overlap of people between projects that that sort of thing really isn't a problem. It's not like Gizmocopter (or any of our endeavors) is in the kind of "separate organizational box" that you seem to be imagining... and the concept of "transitioning within the organization" assumes a formal structure not in evidence. -dave w _______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
