Brandon Fosdick wrote:

BF> Hans Ulrich Ammann wrote:
>> But personally I think his main problem at the moment is not the choice of
>> a appropriate arrangement but the fact that whatever system he is going to uses
>> the engine, or engines have to work in a consistent and predictable way.

BF> A lot of this discussion seems to be driven by the unpredictability of 
BF> the engines. Is this a characteristic of the chosen propellants? Would a 
BF> different propellant combination be inherantly more (or less) predictable?

BF> Not that I'm advocating a switch, I'm just wondering out loud.

 There is no such thing as "easy" propellants. After discarding the liquid
 propellants that are no realistic choice for Amateurs like Hydrogen, the
 Hydrazines, Nitrogen Tetroxide, Nitric Acid... (In Ignition! from John D.Clark
 you can even find nastier substances), there is not much left.
 On the oxidiser Side there are LOX, NOX, and Peroxide, which in a biprop
 configuration can be burned with hydrocarbons like kerosene, alcohol, gasoline.
 Peroxide combined with a catalyst can be used as a monoprop.
 Any of these choices can be made to work reliably and safely and they all have
 their advantages and their draw backs.
 To bring a propulsion system to work in a consistent and predictable way,
 will take a lot of time, consume a considerable amount of money and require
 a big number of test firings.
 First and foremost one has to set up a reliable test stand with measuring
 equipment.
 There is virtually no way to cut corners in that business. And making more
 than one modification or even changing more than one parameter at a time is
 seldom a god idea.
 XCOR for instance has made hundreds of static tests with their engines, before
 the rocket plane made the first flight. And these guys had already some hands
 on engineering and propulsion experience, when they started their business.


 
 Hans Ulrich Ammann
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
ERPS-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list

Reply via email to