Michael Wallis wrote:
Neodys <http://newton.dm.unipi.it/cgi-bin/neodys/neoibo?objects:2004MN4;main> shows 55 observations over the same span, though the impactor table says 35. It also shows a higher probability of impact (0.593% instead of 0.34%).On Thu 23.Dec'04 at 11:09:42 -0800, Dave W wrote:
From arocket... -dw
Paul Breed wrote:
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/
Paul
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://exrocketry.net/mailman/listinfo/arocket
Interesting. Based on 36 observations over 6 months? That's not a lot of data points, even if it is spread out. I wonder if they've done an historical search yet. 2004 MN4 may be on older images. Certainly worth keeping an eye on. We've got about 24 years if the preliminary numbers hold up. My guess is they won't, but I'm an optimist.
Anything with a positive Palermo scale value is "interesting." I could care less about the Torino scale :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature_______________________________________________ ERPS-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.erps.org/mailman/listinfo/erps-list
