On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As to what the what the value of 1.0m == 1.00m should be, the amount
> of code and the amount of spec writing effort is the same either way.
> I can see arguments both ways. But if it were up to me, the
> tiebreaker would be what the value of typeof(1.1m) is. If "number",
> the scale tips slightly towards the answer being false. If "object",
> then then scale is firmly on the side of the answer being true.
>
> All things considered, I would argue for false.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Mark S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> All things considered, I would argue for false.
>>
>> I'm curious. If 1.0m == 1.00m were false, what about 1.0m < 1.00m and
>> 1.0m > 1.00m?
>
> 1.0m == 1.00m should be true.
I'm confused. All things considered, what do you think 1.0m == 1.00m should be?
--
Cheers,
--MarkM
_______________________________________________
Es-discuss mailing list
Es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
