On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Mark S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As to what the what the value of 1.0m == 1.00m should be, the amount >> of code and the amount of spec writing effort is the same either way. >> I can see arguments both ways. But if it were up to me, the >> tiebreaker would be what the value of typeof(1.1m) is. If "number", >> the scale tips slightly towards the answer being false. If "object", >> then then scale is firmly on the side of the answer being true. >> >> All things considered, I would argue for false.
Typo in the above: I meant === > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Mark S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> All things considered, I would argue for false. >>> >>> I'm curious. If 1.0m == 1.00m were false, what about 1.0m < 1.00m and >>> 1.0m > 1.00m? >> >> 1.0m == 1.00m should be true. > > I'm confused. All things considered, what do you think 1.0m == 1.00m should > be? true > -- > Cheers, > --MarkM - Sam Ruby _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
