On Oct 10, 2008, at 11:58 AM, P T Withington wrote:
> ? If so, perhaps you can see how I might imagine that:
>
> function foo () {{
> var bar = ...;
> }}
>
> might be sugar for:
>
> function foo () {
> let bar = ...;
> }Nope, not compatible and not what I meant. Just the function's name is let-bound (block-scoped) for a function defined directly in a block. /be _______________________________________________ Es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
